On the weekend of January 8 and 9, 2011, St James Anglican Church in Collins Street, Drysdale, will be holding their annual second hand book sale.
Opening times are from 9am 5pm on the Saturday and from 10am to 4pm on the Sunday.
Collection of books can be arranged by phoning 5251 2594.
Dates: Friday, 21st to Sunday, 23rd of January, 2011
Entries close 11th January 2011
The 2011 January Show will be held at the Drysdale/Leopold Pony Club Grounds. 2 Rings - Sand and Grass - height classes starting at 50cm - 1.15m. See the Geelong Showjumping Club website for more details.
The Bellarine Times (14 December 2010 p.1) article "On the trail - push begins to introduce an equestrian trail across the Bellarine", by Alison Martin, reports that
"A campaign by local and visiting horse riders to create a trail network across the peninsula has been boosted by Bellarine Tourism. Equestrians and horse enthusiasts have been calling for a network of horse trails on the Bellarine for several years, prompted by the huge increase of cars on local roads and growth of the local horse industry. Bellarine Tourism and the Committee for Bellarine are also pushing for the horse trail initiative to be implemented to address safety issues for riders and to capitalise on tourism and economic opportunities for the region.
Committee for Bellarine spokesperson, Tom O'Connor, said the committee had met with council regarding the need for the study implementation. "Equestrian, pony club, recreational and thoroughbred are the four components of the Bellarine's horse industry which is a significant part of the Bellarine and very much a core component for the rural strategy," he said. "The horse trail study provides the potential for employment growth and underpins environment, social and economic focuses on the Bellarine." O'Connor said he was confident the horse trail initiative could be a success, particularly if created in conjunction with the Bellarine Taste Trail..."
As has been previously mentioned on this blog, the Geelong Council have noted the Bellarine Horse Trails Study in their Council meeting minutes of 23 November 2010 - provided in pdf format (4.62mb).
Below are the questions asked by ratepayers and the answers provided by the City of Greater Geelong to issues raised regarding the Drysdale and Clifton Springs Drainage Proposal. The questions and answers were published in the Minutes of Council meeting (14 Dec 2010) provided in pdf format (3.64mb) on the Council's website
Question: Cheryl Hardy asked the following question on behalf of Joan Hardy: Re Agenda Section B Reports Item 3 14 Dec 2010. As governed by the Local Government Act 1989, the basic framework of a special rate or charge scheme is that there is an initial proposal, it is advertised, participants can place submissions or objections before Council and then Council arbitrates on the scheme. Owners of affected properties have not been afforded the opportunity by Council to comment on the deferral proposal as detailed in Recommendation B. This is a disappointing move by Council to not comply with the requirements of the Act. As such said owners won't have the usual allotted time to consider nor any time at all to consider and respond to this new addition to Council's proposal. Why is Council taking this path and not affording ratepayers the opportunity to comment on the deferred payment charge scheme?
Answer: Gary Van Driel, General Manager City Services, responded that Council has followed the Special Charge process under S163 of the Local Government Act; undertaken the Intention to Declare, notified owners, invited submissions, heard submissions via the submissions review panel and prepared the declaration report based on recommendations from the submissions review panel. Property owners will have the opportunity to lodge an application for review with VCAT within one month of receipt of the levy notice.
Question: Cheryl Hardy asked the following question on behalf of Bryce Hardy: Re Agenda Section B Reports Item 3 14 Dec 2010. Report Background. The report states the scheme includes 20 properties and 18 owners. 14 objections were received to the proposed scheme. Section 163B(6) of the Local Government Act 1989 states: Council cannot make a declaration if the Council receives objections from persons who will be required to pay the special rate or special charge in respect of a majority of the rateable properties in respect of which the special rate or special charge would be imposed. Council therefore should not proceed with this special charge. Why is Council ignoring the 14 objections and there not complying with the Act?
Answer: Gary Van Driel responded that under Section 163B (2) of the Local Government Act 1989 Council can make a declaration to levy a special rate or special charge to recover costs where the scheme is (a )a drainage scheme that Council has declared is required for reasons of public health. This includes recovery of more than two thirds of the cost and also be applied if the majority of rateable properties object.
Question: Cheryl Hardy asked the following question: Re Agenda Section B Reports Item 3 14 December 2010. 8 months ago you first raised this special charge scheme for drainage. 14 objections were received including those from pensioners. On Friday you have released revisions to this scheme and have not allowed the affected parties to comment. The affected ratepayers have not been able to examine this new proposal in detail and now you want Council to vote on it. Why are you not following due process as laid down by the Local Government Act?
Answer: Gary Van Driel responded Council has followed the requirements of the Local Government Act. Council is now in the position where it may abandon, modify or adopt the scheme. If objectors are unhappy with the position of Council they have the right to seek review through VCAT.
Patrick Hughes asked the following questions:
Question 1): When and from whom did council officers receive advice about the legality of proceeding with the option to defer payment - a policy that has not been exhibited for public scrutiny and comment?
Answer: Gary Van Driel responded that Council has taken legal advice – not a policy of Council but has been specific.
Question 2): Is the proposed 5% p.a. interest on a deferred special charge simple or compound; and how does the council justify charging landowners in Central Road 5% interest p.a., when the council will incur no continuing expense after it pays its share of the cost of the drain in Central Road?
Answer: Gary Van Driel responded that the 5% interest is compound. The 5% on the deferred payment scheme goes towards offsetting the interest that Council would incur at the end of a five year period should income not be recovered in a timely manner from the special charge scheme. Cr Farrell indicated that when Council discussed the scheme an undertaking was that Council would allow five years for residents to pay. When Council adopted the budget in June 2010 that deferment was not part of that process.
As was previously advised Council has deferred making a decision on this item until the Council meeting to be held on 25 January 2011.
The Geelong Council has on its agenda for this Tuesday 14 December their proposal to levy a special charge to construct a main drain in the Central Road area of Clifton Springs / Drysdale.
Below is the extract from the agenda - which is available in pdf format on the Council's website (11,391kb). (This document requires the use of Adobe Acrobat Reader).
CENTRAL ROAD AREA, CLIFTON SPRINGS - CONSTRUCTION OF A MAIN DRAIN - SRC 299 DECLARATION OF CHARGE
Portfolio: Transport and Infrastructure - Cr Richards
Source: City Services - Engineering Services
General Manager: Gary Van Driel
Index Reference: Subject: Special Rates and Charges
Street: Central Road, Clifton Springs
That in accordance with Section 163 and 163 B(2)(a) of the Local Government Act 1989:
1) the following declaration of a Special Charge be confirmed:
a) a special charge be declared for the period until the work has been completed and the scheme finalized.
b) the special charge be declared for the purpose of defraying any expenses incurred by Council in relation to the construction of a main drain to service properties in the Jetty Road, Ada Street, Thomas Street and Central Road area, Clifton Springs which project:
b1) will provide proper drainage and facilitate subdivision both now and in the future, of each of the properties in the scheme;
b2) Council considers is or will be a special benefit to those persons required to pay the special charge (and who are described in succeeding parts of this Resolution); and
b3) arises out of Council's function of planning for and providing infrastructure for property owners.
c) the:
c1) cost of performing the function described in Part 1 (b) of this Resolution based on estimated cost, be recorded as $1,492,827; and
c2) total amount of the special charge to be levied, as based on estimated cost, be recorded as $1,492,827.
d) it be recorded that, for the purposes of section 163(2)(a) of the Local Government Act 1989, the special charge proceeds will not exceed the amount calculated in accordance with the prescribed formula (R x C = S), the:
d1) 'benefit ratio' (R) being calculated at 100% and representing the total benefits of the special charge scheme that will accrue as special benefits to all persons liable to pay the special charge; and
d2) 'community benefit' (C) being assumed as nil.
e) the following be specified as the area for which the special rate is so declared:
e1) the area within municipal district of Council highlighted in the plan attached to this Resolution ("the area").
f) the following be specified as the land in relation to which the special charge so declared:
f1) land within the area shown on the plan.
g) the following be specified as the criteria which form the basis of the special charge so declared:
g1) ownership of any land described in Part 1(e) of this Resolution.
h) the following be specified as the manner in which the special charge so declared will be assessed and levied:
h1) the cost allocated has been based on lot area; and
h2) the special charge will be levied by sending notice to the person who is liable to pay, pursuant to section 163(4) of the Local Government Act 1989.
i) having regard to the preceding parts of this Resolution but subject to Section 166 (1) of the Local Government Act 1989, it be recorded that, subject to any further Resolution of Council, the special charge will be due and payable on the date(s) fixed under Section 167 of the Local Government Act 1989 as the date or dates as specified in Councils repayment schedule.
2) there are no incentives declared as incentives to be given by Council for the payment of the special charge before the date(s) specified for its payment under Section 167 (3) of the Local Government Act 1989.
3) Council's Chief Executive Officer be authorised to levy the Special Charge in accordance with Section 163 (4) of the Local Government Act 1989.
That;
a) the concession be applied to the special charges applicable for main drainage construction for the Jetty Road, Ada Street, Thomas Street and Central Road, Clifton Springs (Central Road Area).
b) the concession be applied to those properties forming part of the scheme which are shown in Schedule B attached to this resolution.
c) it be recorded that Council may grant a concession in accordance with Section 169 (i)(d) of the Local Government Act 1989 (the Act) in order to assist the proper development of the Central Road area.
d) Council considers the granting of a concession to the specified properties will provide Community benefit in that it facilitates and increases the likelihood of success of the special charge scheme for main drainage construction which will ultimately benefit all property owners forming part of the scheme in the Central Road area. Construction of the main drain is required for the orderly, proper and safe development of the Central Road area properties within the drainage catchment.
e) having regard to the Section 169(1B)(a) of the Act, Council confirms that the concession to owners of the specified properties, does not exceed one third of the rateable properties in the municipal district.
f) the following be specified as the measure in which the concession shall be given:
f1) all properties included in the scheme at the time of declaration of the charges; and
f2) properties in accordance with (f1) above shall have the charges resulting from the scheme, deferred (the deferred charges).
g) the following be specified as the manner in which the deferred charges shall become due and payable:
g1) deferred charges relating to properties in accordance with (f1) above shall become due and payable by the owners of the properties as follows:
g1a) on sale of the property by the owner, to another party, within 30 days of the finalization of the contract of sale and on receipt of a notice from Council requesting payment;
g1b) on the transfer in any way of the property to other parties;
g1c) on sub-divisional development of the property by the owner, within 30 days of the issue of a certificate of compliance and on receipt of a notice from Council requesting payment.
g1d) on development of the property not described in (g1b) above, but substantially changes or alters the land by building works or otherwise, within 30 days of completion of the project, at the issue of a certificate of occupancy, or as deemed substantially completed by Council and on receipt of a notice from Council requesting payment.
g1e) the amount of the special charge shall be adjusted at 1 July each
year until the amount is paid, by an interest rate of five percent.
g2) in accordance with (g1a), (g1b), (g1c) and (g1d) above, it be recorded that the concession will be revoked and the special charge will become due and payable in accordance with those provisions.
h) having regard to the previous parts of this Resolution when charges become due and payable pursuant to (g2) above, it be recorded that, subject to any further Resolution of Council, the special charge will be due and payable on the date(s) fixed under Section 167 of the Local Government Act 1989 as the date or dates on or by which Council's general rates are due.
i) there are no incentives declared as incentives to be given by Council for the payment of the deferred special charge before the date(s) specified for its payment under Section 167(3) of the Local Government Act 1989.
This project involves the proposed construction of a main drain with its outlet at Griggs Creek, along the north boundary of the Clifton Springs Primary School, south in Jetty Road, Ada Street to Central Road, then south, then entering private property to the east.
A Retirement Village has been proposed to the east of Central Road on a 9.68 ha parcel of land (101 Central Road). The developer of this complex approached Council several years ago and was advised such a development could not proceed unless a main drainage system was installed.
A main drainage system would not only service the Retirement Village site but also surrounding property. Some of this surrounding property is zoned Residential 1 and other land zoned Rural Living is presently undergoing a rezoning process.
Considerable interest has been shown by some of these landowners, to develop. As the developer of the proposed Retirement Village could not proceed and after discussions and negotiations a proposal to solve the impasse was put forward. This solution involved the upfront construction and funding of the main drain estimated to cost $1.5m. Council would then make its best endeavours to recover a share of the cost from abutting owners who would benefit from the provision of a drainage outfall. A legal agreement was subsequently put in place and signed by both parties. This agreement essentially involved the following:
This was considered an appropriate means to facilitate the initial development (the Retirement Village) and given the rezoning, enable subsequent development to take place. It is also cost neutral for Council as there is no necessity for an initial outlay of funds. Using a special charge arrangement, Council is collecting the funds, to pay off the loan, put forward by the initial developer.
The scheme includes 20 properties and 18 owners. There is approximately 1.8ha of existing subdivisional development to the east which would also utilize the drain. This consists of 19 residential lots most already built on. These properties have already been subdivided and would not benefit to the same extent that the other scheme lots would. These lots are therefore included as a cost to Council.
Council considered an "Intention to Declare" report of 23 February 2010 and resolved to proceed to advertise the scheme. Fourteen objections were received and the scheme caused a considerable amount of discussion and concern in the local community.
As a result of the submissions process a number of matters were raised and briefly these are as follows:
Prior to the Submissions Panel all Councillors were distributed with a copy of the individual submissions. Attached at Appendix 3-4 is an "Issues Sheet" which was sent out to all owners recently which addresses a variety of matters raised.
The special charge scheme, as proposed covers the relevant drainage catchment, and due to various differences in zoning and a proposed rezoning, creates some inconsistencies.
The major issue, which was raised by many of the objectors was the inconsistency in the fact that the owners of properties in the area subject to a rezoning were offered an arrangement through a Section 173 Agreement whereby the charge would only proceed when development takes place. Many owners believed this should apply to all.
The Submissions Panel carefully considered all matters raised by property owners and others. The Panel recommendation to Council included three matters:
Associated with the above, is that the Consumer Price Index should apply as Council may not receive funds for a considerable period of time.
Legal advice was obtained regarding the way this arrangement could be effectively implemented though a Council resolution. Council has powers under Section 169(i)(d) of the Local Government Act to grant a rate concession. It is of note that this method has been used for the Belmont Street carpark to defer payment by those owners who currently use commercially zoned properties for residential purpose only.
The matter of deferral of the charge was not raised in Council's original special charge scheme proposal i.e. the "Intention to Declare" stage. Therefore there is some risk of challenge given this is a change in the way Council is approaching the scheme.
Discussions and negotiations have been underway regarding development and particularly the provision of main drainage in this area, for at least a decade. The proposal put forward is now a feasible and practical solution. Council is, in fact, locked into the arrangements through a legal agreement. The penalty cost, should Council wish to void this agreement is approximately $1.1m.
The fundamental concept of all special rate and charge schemes is special benefit. Council must be confident that special benefit applies to each of the properties in the scheme. Special benefit is essentially a benefit these properties receive as a result of the work, which is over and above any other property which does not form part of the scheme. The important benefit received by the properties in the scheme, is that given other planning and servicing constraints, they can be developed by means of further subdivision. This has the potential to provide a financial gain for property owners. As indicated, without the drain, subdivision cannot proceed even if the current zoning is in place.
Another important benefit is the fact that the properties will use the drain for conveying excess stormwater from the lots. Usage of infrastructure (road and drain) is considered to be one of the highest levels of benefit. Provision of underground drainage also eliminates any public health problems which may arise from discharge of water to surface, particularly when development commences.
The estimated cost of the project is as follows:
Cost to initial developer for 2 lots - $348,919
Cost to 18 titles, 17 owners - $1,078,024
Cost contribution by Council for 19 properties already subdivided -$65,884Total $1,492,827
The basic framework of a special rate or charge scheme is that there is an initial proposal, it is advertised, participants can place submissions or objections before Council and then Council arbitrates on the scheme.
In this instance owners have not had the opportunity to comment on the deferral proposal, although many appear to be strong advocates. This provides a risk factor in Council proceeding with the scheme. The alternative is to halt the process and recommence the scheme. This is not a desirable option and should be avoided as the local community has already been subjected to a difficult and sometimes confusing process.
On balance and given the advice received, Council should proceed with the scheme in its current form and include the deferred payment arrangements. Environmental Implications
The catchment area is developed to some extent and further development would exacerbate runoff. The main drain will capture this runoff and with the subsequent development roads will be provided as well as grassed areas. In the longer term there is a minimization of silt laden runoff which enters Griggs Creek and eventually Port Phillip Bay.
The Retirement Village is providing some water retarding facilities to capture silt before discharging to the drain. Excavation is required as the drain enters Griggs Creek, however, this is to be restored and a discharge facility provided.
All infrastructure works result in energy consumption and greenhouse emissions. This takes place in the production of materials, such as pipes and the construction phase. This, however, ceases once the works are constructed and there is minimal ongoing maintenance. There are no carbon offsets applicable. Where possible, excavated spoil will be returned to the drainage trench as backfill.
There are no natural habitats on the route of the drain. Natural habitats in Griggs Creek are an unknown quantity; however, the level of disruption of the creek bank is confined to one location with a right angled entry.
The project is cost neutral regarding the ultimate return of capital. However the timing of the return of funds is unknown and Council will incur some opportunity cost, loss, having to pay out the Retirement Village Developer within 5 years. Should Council not proceed with the scheme, or the scheme be unsuccessful, Council faces a $1.1m penalty. If this eventuated, this money needs to be allocated from main drainage funds.
The Special Charge Scheme complies with the relevant legislative provisions of the Local Government Act.
There are no Council staff engaged in this project who have any pecuniary interest or own land.
There is a legal agreement in place and the provision of a Special Charge Scheme is nominated as a condition of the agreement. The condition actually states that Council will use its best endeavours to initiate a Special Charge Scheme.
Drainage by its nature is underground and is very unlikely to impact on any vulnerable groups within the community. The works, therefore, do not result in the exclusion of any particular groups activities. There is no doubt that some owners will have difficulty paying for the works. There is a longer term financial benefit for these however, as well as a means to pay for the works by instalments over five years.
Property owners will be advised of the outcome of Council's decision on this main drainage proposal.
This report relates to the proposed construction of a main drain to service the general area of Jetty Road, Ada Street, Thomas Street and Central Road, Clifton Springs which consists of excavation, supply and placement of underground drains and pits, miscellaneous works, reinstatement, legal advice, professional services associated with survey, engineering design, drafting, supervision and administration of the project all as included in the cost estimate shown below.
Refer copy of PDF of the agenda for detailed cost estimates.
SPECIAL CHARGE SCHEME FOR MAIN DRAIN
TO SERVICE THE GENERAL AREA OF JETTY ROAD, ADA STREET,
THOMAS STREET AND CENTRAL ROAD CLIFTON SPRINGS - individual details of the properties affected - please refer copy of PDF of the agenda for detailed charges against each property.
1. Residential blocks fronting Eastwood Crescent, Flinders View Drive and Lacoora Avenue. These are recently developed traditional 'residential' style allotments which are within the drainage catchment and it was always the intention to include these in the scheme. There is no charge on these properties, it is paid for by Council.
2. The Retirement Village site is currently partly zoned Residential 1 Zone (R1Z) and part subject to re-zoning from Rural Living Zone (RLZ) to R1Z.
3. Area bounded by Thomas Street, Ada Street, Jetty Road and Central Road. This area is currently being rezoned from RLZ to R1Z. Most owners have signed a Section 173 agreement with a set of conditions and importantly "…the Owner shall not later than upon the date which a Statement of Compliance issues in respect of a Plan of Subdivision of the subject land which creates any residential lot, pay the Council the drainage works contribution". A Section 173 agreement can only be initiated when rezoning or a planning application applies and cannot be invoked where no such action is taking place and the land is "static" with respect to development.
4. Larger lots which are currently zoned RLZ (2 ha or 5 acres) and not subject to the current re-zoning. It is a reasonable assumption however, that these lots, shortly to be bordering R1Z would be the subject of favourable consideration given an application for rezoning.
5. R1Z land to the north of Ada Street and to the east and west of Central Road. These lots have potential for further subdivision.
The drain has been designed to current best practice and is based on the assumption of 70% impervious area for the catchment.
The Drysdale / Clifton Springs structure plan makes specific mention of the Central Road area and the use of "A Development Contribution Plan (DCP) may also be appropriate to assist in the delivery of drainage infrastructure…".
The complete agenda is available in pdf format on the Council's website (11,391kb). (This document requires the use of Adobe Acrobat Reader).
"The Federal Government has announced a $500,000 refurbishment of the nearby former Palmerston Court nursing home to accommodate new clinical space... Work on the new rooms will commence early next year, allowing the centre to expand its existing staff of 12 doctors and offer a wider range of services including dietitian, psychologist, diabetes educator and health conferencing facilities..."
"COUNCIL should adopt the recommendations of its own study into a proposed trail network on the Bellarine Peninsula to prevent “dangerous” conditions for riders, according to a peak riding body.
Pony Club Association Victoria president Jan Faulkner was “thrilled” that council’s study recommended designated “horse-friendly” roads, improved signage, a code of conduct for riders and development of off-road trails.
She called on councillors to act on the study, which went before council last week.
“I'’m not sure why they haven’t decided yet whether or not to follow the recommendations because I would think it would only be natural to accept them..."
"A council spokesperson said councillor John Doull thought that “at this stage the public on the Bellarine should be allowed to absorb the contents of the horse trails study and make their opinions known through the appropriate channels”."
The City of Greater Geelong will Note the Bellarine Peninsula Horse Trails Study tomorrow night - Tuesday 23 November 2010 at their council meeting. Below is the agenda item on the subject which I have extracted as they have it buried in the pdf of their agenda which they have published on their website.
Notes usually means - yes that is a really nice study and we think its great but we are not going to do anything about it - I would like to be wrong - please tell me I am wrong!
The agenda item is available on the City of Greater Geelong website in pdf format.
Portfolio: Cr John Mitchell
Source: Projects, Recreation & Central Geelong
General Manager: Dean Frost
Index Reference: Bellarine Peninsula Horse Trails Study
That Council notes the Bellarine Horse Trails Study.
The Exercise, Recreation and Sport Survey (ERASS) collect information on the frequency, duration, nature and type of physical activity that are participated in for exercise. In relation to "horse riding and other equestrian activities', the 2007 Annual Report found that:
Using the ERASS and ABS data for population, pet, age and gender, the total number of horse's riders on the Bellarine Peninsula is in the order of 331, including approximately 86 children and young people aged between 5-19 years.
The ABS data indicates that 1% of households had a pet horse and therefore considering the household data for the Bellarine Peninsula, it is likely that there is in the order of 126 households with a horse.
Based on the data presented above the number of recreational horse riders based on the Bellarine Peninsula is likely to be at least 330, and no more than 1000. Whilst it is difficult to put an accurate figure on the number of recreational horse riders, it is probably closer to 330.
The Bellarine Peninsula Recreation and Leisure Needs Study 2006 identified a lack of equestrian facilities, particularly cross country courses, as a key issue to be addressed. The Leisure Needs study was silent on the need for a network of trails on the Peninsula to support trail riding activities.
In 2007 a group of local trail riders and other people involved in the equine industry on the Bellarine Peninsula presented Council with a community submission advocating for the development of a network of recreational tracks and trails on the Bellarine Peninsula (the submission was entitled 'Bellarine Rural Tracks & Trails Strategy 2007-2012').
The aim of the project is to validate the directions proposed in the community submission and investigate the need for and feasibility of developing a network of horse trails on the Bellarine Peninsula.
The strategy was required to consider such issues as:
The City of Greater Geelong appointed consultants to investigate the need for, and feasibility of, developing a network of horse trails on the Bellarine Peninsula. Two key outcomes of the project were to assess demand for trails and the capacity of some or all of the proposed trails to be shared by horse riders, cyclists and/or walkers, and to recommend a management framework to ensure that any proposed Trail is sustainable, affordable and of benefit.
Based on the data presented in the Bellarine Peninsula Horse Trails Background Report (Appendix 7-1) the number of recreational horse riders based on the Bellarine Peninsula is likely to be at least 330, and no more than 1,000. Whilst it is difficult to put an accurate figure on the number of recreational horse riders, it is probably closer to 330, than 1,000.
These horse riders represent both existing and potential demand for horse trails on the Bellarine Peninsula. Not all recreational horse riders will use trails if they were provided. Since the number of accessible and safe horse trails (or routes) is very small, existing demand for horse trails is correspondingly small. Although the demand for horse trails is small there are a number of horse riding opportunities that exist on the Bellarine Peninsula that will service the existing and likely future local needs.
Existing horse riding opportunities on the Bellarine Peninsula include: Road Network: Under the road rules, horses are regarded as a vehicle and riders are subject to the same road rules as apply to other drivers. There are some specific additional rules regarding helmets, riding two abreast and other rider safety stipulations.
Beaches: Horse riding is not permitted on the beaches between Ocean Grove and Point Lonsdale; however, it is permitted at Point Richards, St Leonard's and Indented Heads, and also 13th Beach. The main reasons for excluding horse riding on beaches and foreshore areas relate to risk management (relating to conflict with other beach goers) and environmental (relating to erosion, compaction and weed control). Even with these limitations longer term opportunities exists to establish policies which eliminate risks and environmental damage whilst at the same time permitting horse riding on beaches. Strict conditions will be required and policing of access will be necessary. It will require negotiated outcomes between the various committees of management (land managers). At a minimum horse riding should not be permitted during peak holiday periods, on or near dunes or during nesting seasons. It should be noted at the time of the study the Barwon Coast and Bellarine Bayside were not receptive to this possibility.
Bellarine Rail Trail: Horse riding is permitted on between Geelong and the Drysdale Railway Station, but not permitted on the Drysdale to Queenscliff section of the Rail Trail. The two issues that restrict horse riding access to this section of the Rail Trail include conflict with other trail users and the existing tourist train service and damage to native vegetation.
It is possible to overcome the problems of risk management and environmental degradation by appropriate management of horse riding. For example by not permitting horse riding when the railway is scheduled to operate, and requiring horse riders to remain on designated tracks, and to avoid clearly marked native vegetation, including grasses. This would require the agreement of the Geelong Steam Preservation Society. At the time of the study the Geelong Steam Preservation Society were not receptive to this possibility.
Very few opportunities exist to create a safe circular horse route on the Bellarine Peninsula.
The best option revolves around the Bellarine Rail Trail: Lake Lorne – Gilles Road – Basin Road - Princess Road – Swan Bay Road – Banks Road – Andersons Road – Lake Lorne
Given the width of the road reserves, the amount of native vegetation, including native grasses, most horse riding will be done on the road, rather than the road verges. The route can be extended by including the Bellarine Rail Trail, subject to negotiating a suitable outcome with the Steam Preservation Society, and by opening Sheppard's Road between the Rail Trail and Banks Road.
Additional out and back routes can include:
Please see the Bellarine Peninsula Horse trails Study Appendix A, for the proposed network of friendly horse routes on the Bellarine Peninsula.
Improving the quality of horse riding facilities will involve three distinct approaches:
1. Relatively low cost actions which can be taken in the short term.
a. In association with the horse riding community prepare a Code of Conduct for horse riders using horse friendly roads (and also for use on the Geelong to Drysdale section of the Bellarine Rail Trail).
b. Designate the following roads as horse friendly: Drysdale – Leopold Pony Club - Gilles Road - Basin Road - Princess Street - Swan Bay Road - Banks Road - Andersons Road – Drysdale – Leopold Pony Club.
c. Adequately signpost areas of remnant native vegetation along Gilles Road, Basin Road, Princess Street, Swan Bay Road, Banks Road and Andersons Road, particularly native grasses.
d. Install advisory signs along Gilles Road, Basin Road, Princess Street, Swan Bay Road, Banks Road and Andersons Road at appropriate intervals to warn motorists of horse riders and to drive slowly (eg 40 kph).
e. Promote the horse friendly route and code of conduct through Council's normal media outlets (eg web site) and via the horse riding community.
f. Monitor use of the route by horse riders, the incidence of accidents or near accidents involving horses and damage to native vegetation.
g. Subject to satisfactory introduction of the horse friendly route (i.e. significant number of horse riders using the route, no negative feedback regarding the condition of the road surface or the speed of vehicles, no increase in accidents involving horses and no horse related damage to native vegetation), consider extending the horse friendly route with out and back links from Banks Road along Sheppards Road, and from Andersons Road to Burrows Road - Manifold Road – Grassy Point Road – Batmans Road.
h. Adequately signpost areas of remnant native vegetation, particularly native grasses, along all designated horse friendly roads.
i. Install advisory signs along Sheppards Road, Burrows Road, Manifold Road, Grassy Point Road and Batmans Road at appropriate intervals to warn motorists of horse riders. Advisory signs will also be required at the intersection of Andersons Road and Portarlington – Queenscliff Road and Batmans Road and Portarlington – Queenscliff Road to warn motorists of horse riders and horse riders of a major road. The intersection of Drysdale-St Leonards Road/Grassy Road/Bluff Road will require advisory signs for horse riders warning of the dangers of the intersection.
2. Negotiations with public land managers to improve access to off road horse trails.
a. In the longer term consultation be undertaken with the various land management agencies (Bayside Bellarine Committee of Management, Barwon Coast Committee of Management and Geelong Steam Preservation Society), regarding the feasibility of permitting horse riding in designated areas under their control, subject to specific conditions.
b. Consult with the Borough of Queenscliff relating to beach access at Point Lonsdale.
c. Internally within Council, discuss horse access to beaches along Buckley Park.
d. Should approval from the respective land managers be forthcoming, horse riding only be permitted subject to the following conditions such as:
· At times when trains are not running on the Bellarine railway.
· At times of low use on beaches (eg winter and early morning in summer).
· At times which are not environmentally important to native flora and fauna (eg when the hooded plover is not nesting).
· At locations which are not potentially environmentally destructive (eg not within 20 metres of dunes, or 10 metres of remnant vegetation).
· At locations which are not high risk areas (eg near caravan or camping grounds, designated picnic areas and play areas).
e. A Code of Conduct for horse riders being developed which outlines their rights and responsibilities.
f. Subject to horse riding being permitted on the Rail Trail, Council monitor use of the Rail Trail by horse riders, walkers and cyclists to determine whether significant demand exists to justify opening Sheppards Road between the Rail Trail and Banks Road.
3. Ongoing consultation with the horse community to plan and develop horse riding infrastructure in the medium to long term.
a. Council encourage the formation of a "Horse Riders of the Bellarine Peninsula" group comprising representation of all recreational horse riding. Its primary function being to coordinate the planning of horse related facilities and infrastructure and provide advice to Council on horse related matters.
Horses are highly likely to have significant impact on any areas sensitive flora and fauna. Council will need to comply with all relevant state and federal legislation. Existing and proposed Horse Trail Routes may need to be referred the Commonwealth Environment, Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Victoria's Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988, Native Vegetation Management - A Framework For Action (2002), Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006, Aboriginal Heritage Regulations 2007, Crown Land (Reserves) Act 1978.
The report provides a number of recommendations.
Where implementation of specific recommendations requires a new capital allocation from Council, these will be presented and considered as part of the overall annual budget process (where applicable). Opportunities for funding from the State Government, clubs and the community will be investigated once the plan has been accepted by Council.
Existing and proposed Horse Trail Routes may be referred the Commonwealth Environment, Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, Victoria's Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988, Native Vegetation Management - A Framework For Action (2002), Aboriginal Heritage Act 2006, Aboriginal Heritage Regulations 2007, Crown Land (Reserves) Act 1978.
A planning permit would be required to clear or disturb any native vegetation from the any proposed Horse Trail Route.
No Council officers involved in the preparation of this report are known to have a direct or indirect interest in matters to which this report relates.
There are no immediate risks associated with this report. Appropriate risk management measures will be put in place when implementing the recommendations of the report.
Horse riding is a legitimate recreational activity. It is important that horse trails be established to cater for community interests in this activity. It is possible that without such designated trails Council and other land managers will be faced with an increase in unauthorised and illegal riding in parks, beaches and reserves.
The following consultations were undertaken as part of the methodology used in preparing the Bellarine Horse Trails Study: The Bellarine Horse Trails Study has been overseen by a two tiered management structure. Including -
A Project Working Group comprising representatives from the following organisations:
In addition to the governance structure, personal or telephone interviews with Council staff nominated by the Project Control Group, representatives of land management agencies which control and/or maintain potential land suitable for horse trail development and other potential stakeholders, including:
Other consultations undertaken as part of the development of the report include:
A mail questionnaire to:
| Centre Name | Drysdale |
|---|---|
| Type | Election Day Voting Centre |
| District | Bellarine District |
| Address | Palmerston Street Drysdale |
| Wheelchair | Full Wheelchair Access(FWA) ~ |
| Centre Name | Clifton Springs |
|---|---|
| Type | Election Day Voting Centre |
| District | Bellarine District |
| Address | 186 Jetty Road Clifton Springs |
| Wheelchair | Full Wheelchair Access(FWA) ~ |
| Centre Name | Beacon Point |
|---|---|
| Type | Election Day Voting Centre |
| District | Bellarine District |
| Address | 49-55 Centaurus Avenue Clifton Springs |
| Wheelchair | Wheelchair Access With Assistance(AWA) Parking may be difficult. |
| Centre Name | Bellarine - EVC |
|---|---|
| Type | Early Voting Centre |
| District | Bellarine District |
| Address | 78 The Terrace Ocean Grove 3226 |
| Wheelchair | Full Wheelchair Access(FWA) ~ |
| Centre Name | Geelong EO - EVC |
|---|---|
| Type | Early Voting Centre |
| District | Geelong District |
| Address | Level 3 65 Brougham Street Geelong 3220 |
| Wheelchair | Wheelchair Access With Assistance(AWA) Path of travel from car park may be difficult. |
The Geelong Council has for Public Exhibition: C230 Jetty Road Urban Growth Area Stage 1 Development Contributions Plan
The consultation is open from 21 October 2010 to 4 December 2010.
The amendment applies to land known as Stage 1 of the Jetty Road Urban Growth Area, in the localities of Drysdale, Clifton Springs and Curlewis. This area is generally bounded by Port Phillip Bay to the north, the Bellarine Rail Trail to the south, Jetty Road and Griggs Creek to the east and a line running parallel to and approximately 400 metres east of McDermott Road to the west.
The amendment also applies to part of the land at 1421-1423 Portarlington Road, Drysdale.
The amendment:
To make a submission online please visit C230 Jetty Road Urban Growth Area Stage 1 Development Contributions Plan
"Member for Bellarine Lisa Neville has ruled out funding for a Drysdale bypass. Ms Neville told the Independent traffic levels in the area did not support calls for construction of a bypass “at this stage”.
"We will continue to monitor traffic growth and demand against other projects across the state," the Labor minister said.
The Independent reported in March this year that community leaders were pushing for a funding promise to eliminate the Bellarine Peninsula’s worst traffic bottleneck.
Traffic banks up for hundreds of metres at the intersection of Grubb, Jetty and Portarlington-Geelong roads during peak hours. The queue back into Drysdale along Portarlington-Geelong road can run for over a kilometre.
Plans for further housing development off Jetty Road are set to put more pressure on the intersection..."
Update: 11 October 2010 - The Age today reports (in an article entitled Plan for hundreds of kilometres of new freeways) on the "Proposed 2040 Road Network Development" which links to a map showing the Drysdale bypass as a primary arterial 6 lane plus road. The complete map is available from http://images.theage.com.au/file/2010/10/10/1977327/Melbourne2040.pdf
So the road is still on the cards but we might have to wait another 30 plus years to see it.
Next Tuesday's Geelong Council agenda item 11 (page 96-102) will consider the proposed Jetty Road neighbourhood activity centre (NAC for short). Below is an extract from the agenda detailing what is proposed:
AMENDMENT C188 – JETTY ROAD NEIGHBOURHOOD ACTIVITY CENTRE
Portfolio: Planning – Cr Katos
Source: Economic Development, Planning & Tourism – Strategic
Implementation
General Manager: Peter Bettess
Index Reference: Project: Amendment C188
Subject: Council Reports 2010
That Council resolve to:
1) support Amendment C188 to the Greater Geelong Planning Scheme and Planning Permit 942/2010, and place them on exhibition, subject to:
a) Ministerial Authorisation being received; and
b) the Jetty Road Neighbourhood Activity Centre Master Plan, prepared under DPO20, being approved by Council;
2) request that the Minister for Planning authorise the preparation and exhibition of Amendment C188.
This amendment applies to land at 148-166 Jetty Road, Drysdale, located central to the Jetty Road Growth Area where the proposed Jetty Road Neighbourhood Activity Centre (NAC) is to be located. This land has been identified as the appropriate location of the NAC through an extensive planning process. The Jetty Road Urban Growth Plan (UGP) (adopted 26 June 2007, and amended 23 September 2008) outlines the general location of the NAC, along with the principles and objectives that are to guide its development. Based on the UGP, Council undertook Amendment C152 to rezone Stage 1 of the Growth Area and apply Development Plan Overlay 20 (DPO20) to the land. Of relevance to this amendment, the DPO20 requires the preparation a NAC Master Plan that responds to the topography of the site and resolves the design of a Neighbourhood Activity Centre located centrally to the Jetty Road growth area generally in the vicinity shown in the Jetty Road Urban Growth Plan.
DPO20 requires that the NAC be a street based centre with provision for commercial and non-commercial floor space in the order of 5,000m² and for community services and infrastructure. The DPO specifies that there must be proper integration between commercial and community facilities, including the subregional park.
The amendment proposes to:
Activity Centre as a strip shopping centre where gaming machines are prohibited; The planning permit (Planning Permit 942/2010) is for a two lot subdivision to create a new lot for the NAC land that is to be rezoned. The proposed two lot subdivision will avoid the amendment leading to one land title being in two zones. It will also enable the easier sale or development of the land. It should be noted that while the subdivision can be processed, it can't be finally approved until the land is serviced with an access road (or road reserve).
This proposal is considered to be consistent with the requirements of the DPO20 and will facilitate the development of the Jetty Road NAC in accordance with the UGP, DPO20, and the NAC master plan which is yet to be approved. The NAC master plan, to be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Development Plan Overlay Schedule 20, is yet to be finalised and approved by Council. Once the master plan is approved, the draft DDO schedule and the exact extent of the zone and overlay mapping will be finalised and the amendment placed on exhibition. While the mapping and DDO schedule are not yet finalised, they are sufficiently progressed and there is sufficient strategic justification to enable Council to make an informed decision regarding supporting this amendment.
The subject land sits adjacent the sub-regional hilltop park. While a large part of this park is in Stage 2 of the growth area, the development of the NAC will have a significant bearing on the amenity and function of the park, and therefore the interface and integration with the park is a key issue to be addressed by the proposed DDO. In particular, the DDO seeks to ensure that development adjacent the park does not interrupt key views from the park, including to the Melbourne CBD, and that, consistent with clause 17.01 the buildings do not dominate or 'overpower' any part of the park. The rezoning of the park to Public Park and Recreation Zone will be undertaken once the land is in Council ownership.
The amendment includes the subject land in schedule to clause 52.28-4 as a strip shopping centre where gaming machines are prohibited. The purpose of this clause is to ensure the social and economic impacts of the location of gaming machines are considered and to prohibit gaming machines in specified shopping complexes and strip shopping centres.
Development facilitated by the amendment is not expected to result in any undue impact on the environment. By providing for the local shopping and community needs of the future growth area community and by providing for good pedestrian connection and access it is expected to reduce the amount of travel required by the future population to access day-to-day service, thereby reducing their potential 'carbon footprint'.
The proposed DDO aims to encourage environmentally sound and energy efficient development.
It is not expected that the proposal will result in any financial implications for Council, other than those associated with the usual processing of an amendment and planning permit and the flow on development applications.
As noted above, the proposed amendment is consistent with all major State and Council planning policies.
The proposal complies with the general implementation of State Planning Policy Framework clause 17.01 Economic Development: Activity Centres as the DDO will facilitate the development of an activity centre that will:
The amendment will also facilitate development which will meet the future community's day-to-day needs for retail, office and other commercial services and provide net community benefit in relation to accessibility, efficient infrastructure use and the aggregation and sustainability of commercial facilities.
The amendment complies with the objectives of clause 21.07-3 Retail, as it intends to facilitate the development of a vibrant and viable retail activity centres in accordance with the Geelong Retail Activity Centre Hierarchy The amendment complies with clause 21.14
The Bellarine Peninsula as it will go some way to ensuring that land use and development in the Jetty Road Urban Growth Area proceeds generally in accordance with the Jetty Road Urban Growth Plan Map.
No Council staff involved in the preparation of this report have a direct or indirect interest in the matter to which this report relates.
The proposed amendment is not expected to expose Council to any risk of liability beyond that usually associated with facilitating greenfield development.
The proposed DDO aims to ensure that the future NAC will provide a safe and efficient pedestrian environment and encourage a vibrant, mixed use town centre with design that contributes to a safe, walkable and attractive town centre environment. The proposed DDO will ensure that the sub-regional park is properly integrated with the NAC and that the amenity of the sub-regional park is not diminished by the bulk or scale of any buildings or works.
The amendment is expected to facilitate positive social and economic outcomes for the growth area community by facilitating the development of a NAC that includes adequate community facilities and that will meet their day-to-day shopping needs, decreasing escape expenditure and providing local employment opportunities.
The NAC is also expected provide a focal meeting point for the local community and enable the community to easily create a sense of identity and place.
The amendment will follow the standard amendment process and will be subject to the usual public notification requirements in accordance with the Planning and Environment Act, 1987. The views of relevant agencies will be sought during this time.
The complete agenda (including detailed maps of the location of the Jetty Road development NAC) for the Geelong Council meeting on Tuesday 12 October 2010 is available in pdf format (5.43mb) from the Council's website.
